Lebanese vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Whites/Caucasians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,241,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.13%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lebanese | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 10.3% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 33.9% |
Range | 38.9% | 23.6% |
Mean | 16.6% | 16.7% |
Median | 14.0% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |