Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,591,162 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 3.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 34.6% | 14.4% |
Range | 33.2% | 14.0% |
Mean | 9.2% | 6.6% |
Median | 8.1% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |