Latvian vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Latvian
Bhutanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Latvians
Bhutanese
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,200,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,130,109 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 75.4% |
Range | 46.0% | 73.9% |
Mean | 10.5% | 9.4% |
Median | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Bhutanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czechoslovakian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Italian (9.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |