Jordanian vs Romanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Romanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Romanians
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Romanian |
Minimum | 2.9% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 59.5% |
Range | 36.8% | 58.0% |
Mean | 11.8% | 17.9% |
Median | 10.9% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 22.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |