Japanese vs Osage Male Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Osage
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Osage
12.2%
MALE POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
MALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Osage Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,058,138 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,789,808 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Osage |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 32.1% |
| Range | 97.2% | 30.2% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 13.9% |
| Median | 13.3% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Osage by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Cambodia (12.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), German Russian (12.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Bermudan (12.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Nigeria (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Alaska Native (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Alsatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Cuban (12.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Azores | 4.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
| German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bermudans | 2.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Ugandans | 2.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.1 /100 | #222 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |