Jamaican vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Czechoslovakians
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,819,345 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 39.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 21.7% |
| Range | 11.6% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Senegalese (6.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Shoshone (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |