Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Czechoslovakians
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,219,082 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 67.0% | 57.5% |
Range | 64.9% | 54.2% |
Mean | 17.9% | 21.9% |
Median | 13.8% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), English (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |