Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from the Azores Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Immigrants from the Azores
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Immigrants from the Azores
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from the Azores Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,244,959 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 0.21% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 25.2% |
Range | 37.3% | 24.5% |
Mean | 13.7% | 12.0% |
Median | 12.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from the Azores by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |