Immigrants from Switzerland vs Egyptian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Egyptian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Egyptians
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Egyptian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,922,472 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,431,848 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.94%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Egyptian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 66.7% |
Range | 36.8% | 65.9% |
Mean | 10.4% | 9.5% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Egyptians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.28%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |