Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Immigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Immigrants from the Azores
12.5%
POVERTY
32.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,968,788 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,256,915 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 4.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 3.8% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 21.3% | 24.6% |
Range | 17.5% | 22.8% |
Mean | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 12.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from the Azores by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Delaware (12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Arab (12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (12.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Tsimshian (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 12.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 31.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 12.6% |
South American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 12.7% |
Delaware | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 12.7% |
Arabs | 21.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 12.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 20.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 12.7% |
Iraqis | 20.8 /100 | #196 | Fair 12.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 12.8% |
Spanish | 18.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 12.8% |
Spaniards | 16.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |