Immigrants from South Africa vs Chippewa Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chippewa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chippewa
11.5%
POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chippewa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,262,094 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,014,776 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 36.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.2% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 71.1% |
Range | 53.4% | 63.0% |
Mean | 11.8% | 24.2% |
Median | 9.3% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |