Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,714,857 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 14.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 24.2% | 29.4% |
Range | 23.2% | 28.2% |
Mean | 8.6% | 9.7% |
Median | 8.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |