Immigrants from Poland vs Lithuanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Lithuanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Lithuanians
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Lithuanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,660,101 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,480,494 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 2.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 53.0% |
| Range | 20.2% | 52.8% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 11.4% |
| Median | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Lithuanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Czech (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |