Immigrants from Philippines vs Taiwanese Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,939,679 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,702,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.13%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Taiwanese
Minimum	0.63%	0.94%
Maximum	15.8%	14.4%
Range	15.2%	13.5%
Mean	4.9%	4.7%
Median	4.6%	4.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.5%	2.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	5.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.8%	3.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.5%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.5%	3.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Taiwanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| France	96.9 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%