Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascans
13.3%
POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,154,793 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.14% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 25.8% | 62.3% |
Range | 25.7% | 61.2% |
Mean | 11.8% | 19.9% |
Median | 12.2% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 26.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Alaskan Athabascans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.51%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |