Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Nepal
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Nepal
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,522,018 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Nepal |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 25.5% |
Range | 29.6% | 24.2% |
Mean | 10.9% | 8.5% |
Median | 9.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Nepal by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |