Immigrants from North America vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Indian (Asian)
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Indians (Asian)
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.90%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 3.5% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 21.9% |
Range | 96.5% | 19.5% |
Mean | 26.2% | 11.0% |
Median | 16.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.9% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |