Immigrants from Nigeria vs Cuban Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Cuban
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Cubans
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
36.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Cuban Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,424,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.84%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Cuban |
Minimum | 1.1% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 48.3% |
Range | 50.2% | 41.1% |
Mean | 19.1% | 20.6% |
Median | 19.4% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Cubans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |