Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Malaysian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Malaysian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Malaysians
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Malaysian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,038,180 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,653,491 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.85%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Malaysian |
Minimum | 0.49% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 55.6% | 77.8% |
Range | 55.1% | 74.0% |
Mean | 14.5% | 18.1% |
Median | 12.3% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Malaysians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ecuadorian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |