Immigrants from Moldova vs Burmese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Burmese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Burmese
10.9%
POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Burmese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,373,713 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 37.7% |
Range | 23.7% | 36.2% |
Mean | 10.3% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.7% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Burmese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Singapore (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Korean (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Turkish (11.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |