Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Northern Africa
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,932,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,083,252 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 41.8% |
Range | 39.3% | 39.7% |
Mean | 11.8% | 14.8% |
Median | 10.4% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 15.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |