Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tongan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Tongan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Tongans
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tongan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,857,132 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Tongan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 21.0% |
Range | 15.8% | 18.2% |
Mean | 7.0% | 9.1% |
Median | 7.0% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Tongans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.67%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |