Immigrants from Liberia vs Spanish American Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Spanish American
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Spanish Americans
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Spanish American Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,514 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,163,136 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Spanish American |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.2% | 98.3% |
Mean | 13.8% | 16.5% |
Median | 11.4% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish Americans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Cree (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |