Immigrants from Latin America vs Iroquois Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Iroquois
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Iroquois
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Iroquois Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,334,914 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 3.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 45.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.1% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 19.1% |
| Median | 14.1% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Iroquois by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Mexican (13.7%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |