Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,398,754 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 4.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 40.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.0% | 96.7% |
Mean | 21.5% | 27.0% |
Median | 21.7% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Senegalese (20.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Blackfeet (20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Belize (20.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and West Indian (20.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and Subsaharan African (20.0%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.1% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.2% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.3% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |