Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Houma
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Houma
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,526,564 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 41.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Houma |
Minimum | 0.93% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 37.1% |
Range | 31.5% | 33.5% |
Mean | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Median | 14.5% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |