Immigrants from Italy vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Cherokee
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,038,083 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 34.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.033% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 94.7% |
Mean | 21.2% | 30.7% |
Median | 11.2% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 34.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Macedonian (14.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |