Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Bulgarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Bulgarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Bulgarians
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Bulgarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.25% |
Maximum | 18.6% | 53.6% |
Range | 17.3% | 53.3% |
Mean | 9.4% | 9.0% |
Median | 9.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Bulgarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.89%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |