Immigrants from Guyana vs Cherokee Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guyana
Cherokee
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guyana
Cherokee
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guyana vs Cherokee Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.11%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guyana | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.82% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 61.8% |
Range | 30.0% | 59.5% |
Mean | 14.1% | 21.9% |
Median | 13.7% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guyana and Cherokee by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |