Immigrants from Guatemala vs British West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
British West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
British West Indians
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs British West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.17%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | British West Indian |
Minimum | 4.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 34.4% |
Range | 61.2% | 32.6% |
Mean | 22.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 20.2% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and British West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |