Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
12.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,148,285 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 14.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.96% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 33.3% |
Range | 38.2% | 29.7% |
Mean | 11.3% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are U.S. Virgin Islander (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British West Indian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Honduran (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Inupiat (12.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Mexico (12.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 12.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 12.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 12.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 12.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 12.4% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 12.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 12.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 12.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |