Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,609,977 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 23.0% |
Range | 55.9% | 22.5% |
Mean | 13.0% | 8.4% |
Median | 10.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |