Immigrants from Ecuador vs Jamaican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Jamaican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Jamaicans
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Jamaican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 0.62%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Jamaican |
Minimum | 2.8% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 29.8% |
Range | 23.1% | 24.5% |
Mean | 14.6% | 15.4% |
Median | 14.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Jamaicans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |