Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Liberia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Liberia
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,551,219 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,184,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 40.1% |
Range | 19.1% | 37.0% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.6% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Liberia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |