Immigrants from Congo vs Ottawa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Ottawa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Ottawa
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Ottawa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,983,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,782,789 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Ottawa |
Minimum | 6.1% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 75.0% |
Range | 68.9% | 66.7% |
Mean | 26.6% | 31.8% |
Median | 24.9% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 35.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Ottawa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |