Immigrants from Colombia vs Aleut Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Colombia
Aleut
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Colombia
Aleuts
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
44.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Colombia vs Aleut Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,418,098 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Colombia | Aleut |
Minimum | 3.2% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 24.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 48.7% |
Mean | 13.1% | 16.9% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Colombia and Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Colombia are Venezuelan (13.5%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |