Immigrants from China vs Pakistani Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Pakistani
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Pakistanis
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Pakistani Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,136,890 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.85%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Pakistani |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 24.3% | 32.7% |
Range | 22.4% | 32.0% |
Mean | 10.4% | 11.2% |
Median | 9.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Pakistanis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |