Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ireland Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Ireland
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Ireland
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ireland Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,601,869 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ireland |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 43.3% |
Range | 27.7% | 42.4% |
Mean | 11.7% | 12.4% |
Median | 11.0% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ireland by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Burmese (12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Bhutanese (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |