Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cape Verdean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cape Verdean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cape Verdeans
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cape Verdean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,266,194 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,541,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 36.2% | 33.8% |
Range | 29.7% | 31.8% |
Mean | 17.0% | 15.1% |
Median | 15.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |