Immigrants from Bolivia vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Jordanian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Jordanians
14.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
74.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,322,784 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,384,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 9.8%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Jordanian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 61.5% | 56.5% |
Range | 58.0% | 51.9% |
Mean | 16.7% | 22.1% |
Median | 15.0% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 28.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (14.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Bolivian (14.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |