Icelander vs Immigrants Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
22.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,245,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,808,964 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 0.83%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 47.5% |
| Range | 96.1% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 39.4% | 21.2% |
| Median | 33.3% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.2% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 33.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.9% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |