Icelander vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Belarus
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Belarus
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 41.3% |
| Range | 32.9% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 12.1% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Belarus by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |