Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Oceania
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Oceania
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,068,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 33.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 37.1% | 39.0% |
Range | 33.5% | 34.8% |
Mean | 19.0% | 19.3% |
Median | 20.6% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |