Hmong vs Swiss Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Swiss
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Swiss
14.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Swiss Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,410,058 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,994,211 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 3.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Swiss |
Minimum | 3.8% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.9% | 94.7% |
Mean | 17.1% | 27.6% |
Median | 13.0% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 25.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Swiss by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Indonesian (14.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Slovak (14.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Dutch (14.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and English (14.1%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Hungarian (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Fijian (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Cape Verdean (13.8%, a difference of 0.34%), West Indian (13.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Congo (13.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.8% |
Hungarians | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.8% |
Fijians | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.8% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.9% |
Germans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.9% |
Scottish | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.0% |
Irish | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.0% |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.0% |
Welsh | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.0% |
Hondurans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.0% |
English | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.1% |
Dutch | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.1% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.1% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.2% |