Hispanic or Latino vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Scottish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Scottish
21.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,365,780 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.801 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 36.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Scottish |
Minimum | 12.9% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 52.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.2% | 97.9% |
Mean | 22.1% | 38.1% |
Median | 20.5% | 25.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 52.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 37.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 30.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 30.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Mexican (20.9%, a difference of 0.40%), Inupiat (20.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |