Guyanese vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Immigrants from Liberia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Immigrants from Liberia
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,777,611 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 0.44%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 27.5% | 45.5% |
Range | 24.0% | 42.0% |
Mean | 14.0% | 16.9% |
Median | 13.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Immigrants from Liberia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |