Greek vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Polish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Poles
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,318,702 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.809 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,544,798 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 3.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Polish |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 94.4% | 53.2% |
Range | 92.7% | 52.1% |
Mean | 12.9% | 6.2% |
Median | 4.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.8% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Poles by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Estonian (4.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Scandinavian (4.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Irish (4.2%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |