French Canadian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
French Canadians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.6%
POVERTY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,211,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.65% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 19.2% |
Range | 30.9% | 16.7% |
Mean | 13.3% | 9.5% |
Median | 11.3% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |