Finnish vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Finns
Czechoslovakians
11.4%
POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,501,473 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.30%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 27.4% | 27.8% |
Range | 25.4% | 27.5% |
Mean | 12.0% | 12.1% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |