Filipino vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,130,110 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.340 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,639,009 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 1.5%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Filipino	Immigrants from El Salvador
Minimum	0.62%	4.2%
Maximum	33.7%	100.0%
Range	33.1%	95.8%
Mean	15.0%	19.2%
Median	14.0%	18.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.5%	15.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.9%	21.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.4%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	10.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	10.9%

Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Haitian (19.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (19.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Sierra Leonean (19.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Serbia (19.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (19.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Syria (19.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (19.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (19.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Filipinos	98.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 19.0%
Haitians	98.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 19.0%
Ukrainians	98.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 19.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	98.8 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 19.0%
Sierra Leoneans	98.7 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 19.0%
Salvadorans	98.4 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.4 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 19.1%
Chileans	98.3 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 19.1%
Ecuadorians	98.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	98.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 19.1%
Serbians	98.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	98.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	97.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	97.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.5 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	97.3 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Syria	97.2 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 19.2%
Laotians	97.1 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	96.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 19.3%